The High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 4899 of 2019 as withdrawn. The petitioner moved a motion to withdraw the petition based on his overall defence and the option to explain his admissions in the written statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IRESH Digitally signed byIRESH SIDDHARAM SIDDHARAM MASHAL MASHAL Date: 2021.09.0217:14:09 +0530
11.4899.19 wp.doc
ISM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4899 OF 2019
SHARAD ANAND BUTTE PATIL ….PETITIONER
V/s.
DILIPRAO DATTATREY MOHITE PATIL
…..RESPONDENT
Mr. Sudhir V. Sadavarte for the petitioner
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2021.
P.C.:
1] On instructions a motion is made on instructions by the learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the petition.
2] Keeping in mind the over all defence set up by the petitioner and an option of petitioner-defendant to explain his admissions given in the written statement open, petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
1/1
Sharad Anand Butte Patil
Diliprao Dattatrey Mohite Patil
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
