The petitioner sought a writ regarding dispossession from tenanted premises and alleged non-hearing of an interim application by the District Court at Thane. The Court found no good reason to entertain the writ but expressed hope that the trial court will expedite hearing the matter. The petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Priya Soparkar
1
13 wp 4809-21-c
Digitally signed by IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY PRIYA PRIYA RAJESH CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION RAJESH SOPARKAR SOPARKAR Date: 2021.10.01 WRIT PETITION NO.4809 OF 2021 14:22:09 +0530
Jubilant Foodworks Limited … Petitioner V/s.
DCB Banks Limited and ors. … Respondents ---
Mr.Shreyas Shrivastava alongwith Ms.Dishya Pandey, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr.Charles D'Souza alongwith Mr.Nikhil Rajani, Ms.Apporva Kulkarni i/by M/s V. Deshpande and Co., Advocates for Respondent No.1. Ms.Sutapa Saha, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 4. Mr.A.B.Kadam, AGP for Respondent No.5/State.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 01, 2021.
P.C.:-
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Priya Soparkar 2 13 wp 4809-21-c
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
(UJJAL BHUYAN, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition regarding dispossession and non-hearing of an interim application.
The Court expressed hope that the District Court will hear the interim application expeditiously.
Priya Soparkar
DCB Banks Limited
Jubilant Foodworks Limited
Ujjal Bhuyan
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
