Two writ petitions were sought to be withdrawn by the petitioners. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to seek legal remedy in future.
Both writ petitions disposed of with liberty to avail of remedy permissible in law in future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902 & 903-wp-478-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO.478 OF 2020
AJIT MADHUKARRAO GAVHANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
AND
903 WRIT PETITION NO.525 OF 2020
DILIP VENKATRAO BOIENAR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Panpatte V.S. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. P.S. Patil
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & S.G. MEHARE, J.J.
DATED : 01st SEPTEMBER, 2021
PER COURT:-
(S.G. MEHARE. J)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J)
Mujaheed//
1/1
AJIT MADHUKARRAO GAVHANE
DILIP VENKATRAO BOIENAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
