The High Court at Bombay disposed of a writ petition directing CIDCO to decide the petitioner's representation dated 16 June 2018 expeditiously.
Direction to CIDCO to decide the petitioner's representation dated 16 June 2018 expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4426 OF 2021
Nanddeepak Dayal Patade … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Suraj Dessai Almeida, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. B. B. Sharma, Advocate for Respondent-CIDCO. Ms. Kavita Solunke, AGP for State.
CORAM : A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ DATED : 6TH DECEMBER , 2021.
P.C.:
that the representation of the Petitioner dated 16th June 2018 (page 12 of the Petition), copy whereof has been forwarded to Respondent No.3-CIDCO, be decided by the Respondent No.3-CIDCO.
3. The Writ Petition to stand disposed of.
Digitally signed NIKITA by NIKITAYOGESH YOGESHGADGIL GADGILDate:2021.12.09 12:43:08 +0530
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.)
Nikita Gadgil 1/1
Nanddeepak Dayal Patade
The State of Maharashtra
CIDCO
A. A. SAYED
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
