The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the petitioner's testimony had already been recorded and she was set at liberty in the related Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
927 CrWP 420 20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
927 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.420 OF 2020
SHARIRA MULLA D/O. SHAHID MULLA
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Karad Murlidhar S
APP for Respondent : Mrs. R.P. Gaur.
CORAM: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE: 27.07.2021.
PER COURT :
Learned A.P.P. on instructions informs that already the testimony of the
petitioner has been recorded in the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act matter
as a witness and she has been set at liberty.
2. In view of such state of affairs the Writ Petition is disposed of having become infructuous.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
Sharira Mulla
The State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court