The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 3904 of 2020 as infructuous because the petitioner failed to supply necessary copies after multiple extensions were granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923wp3904o20
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3904 OF 2020
SNEHA SANTOSH JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri Jadhavar Pratap V. AGP for the Respondents/ State : Shri P.G.Borade
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
S.G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE :- 16th September, 2021
Per Court :-
12.03.2020. As the copies were not supplied by the petitioner,
four weeks time was granted by this Court by order dated 21.12.2020. Even then, the petitioner did not supply the copies. This Court, therefore, again passed an order on 22.01.2021 granting three more weeks for supplying the copies failing which, the matter was to be dismissed. Yet, the copies have not
been supplied. Thereafter, again this Court passed an order on 26.02.2021 granting three more weeks. Yet, the copies have not
2 923wp3904o20
been supplied.
being infructuous.
kps (S.G. MEHARE, J.) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
SNEHA SANTOSH JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
