Criminal Writ Petition rendered infructuous and disposed of as the petitioner filed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC during pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
32.Cri.W.P.No.388.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.388/2021 Mahendra Manoharrao Bhure
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Y. Y. Humne, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for Respondent/State.
CORAM : V. M .DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE :02/08/2021.
1.Shri Y. Y. Humne, learned counsel for the
petitioner would submit that the present writ petition has
rendered infructuous inasmuch as during the pendency of
this writ petition, the learned Magistrate has decided the
application filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section
156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. His statement
is accepted.
2.The writ petition is disposed of as rendered
infructuous.
JUDGE
JUDGE
RGurnule
Mahendra Manoharrao Bhure
The State of Maharashtra
V. M. DESHPANDE
AMIT B. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court