Petitioner company stated desire to withdraw writ petition; Court allowed withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO.3809 OF 2020
RISHU KICHU INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
VERSUS
THE MAHARASHTRA STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD.,
ANDOTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Anuj A. Fulpagar h/f Mr.
Katneshwarkar P. R.
Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. A. M. Gaikwad.
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. A. S. Kulkarni.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, AND
S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 07.09.2021
PER COURT:-
1. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that this
petition is circulated under instructions from the petitioner-
Company, who desires to withdraw this petition. The learned
advocate had received a written communication from the
petitioner.
2. In view of the above, this petition is disposed off as withdrawn.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
vmk/-
RISHU KICHU INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
THE MAHARASHTRA STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD.
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court