Mahavir Ginning Factory Prop Gangwal Manikchand Madanlal v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
925
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
925 WRIT PETITION NO.375 OF 2021
MAHAVIR GINNING FACTORY PROP GANGWAL MANIKCHAND MADANLAL VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr Dodya S. G. AGP for Respondents State: Mr. A. R. Kale Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. K. J. Suryawanshi
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 13th January, 2021
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to
withdraw the writ petition. Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
MAHAVIR GINNING FACTORY PROP GANGWAL MANIKCHAND MADANLAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court