The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition after a praecipe was filed. The High Court allowed the withdrawal without costs, disposing of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO.3641 OF 2021
TUSHAR DEVRAO JADHAV VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vishnu B. Madan Patil AGP for Respondents 1 to 4 : Mrs. D.S. Jape Advocate for Respondent 5 : Mr. S.K. Kadam Advocate for Respondent 6 : Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ. DATED : 30/07/2021.
PER COURT :
petition.
costs.
[ R.N. LADDHA, J. ]
[S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
ssc/
TUSHAR DEVRAO JADHAV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
R.N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
