Petitioner filed a writ petition in criminal appellate jurisdiction. On written instructions, the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, which was granted, and the petition was disposed.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Rane
sr.5
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3587 OF 2021
VASANT MAHADEV THAKAR } PETITIONER
V/S.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. } RESPONDENTS
Mr. Sumit Kate i/by. Dr. Mr. Uday Warunjikar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Y.M. Nakhawa, APP for State.
CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.
Thursday, 9th December, 2021.
P.C. :
1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on
written instructions of the petitioner, seeks leave to
withdraw the petition. Leave granted. Petition is disposed
NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT
Digitally signed by NEETA of as withdrawn. SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2021.12.092. Written instructions are taken on record 18:31:39 +0530 and marked “X-1” for identifcation.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
VASANT MAHADEV THAKAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
SANDEEP K. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
