Allowed

Nitin Gangadhar Meshram v. Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd., Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC14 Sept 2021WP/3436/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the respondents again based on a specific administrative circular. The Court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondents.

Nitin Gangadhar Meshram Vs Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd., Mumbai and Others — Bombay HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 W.P.No.3436.2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 3436 OF 2021

¶4

Nitin Gangadhar Meshram,

¶5

..VS..

¶6

Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd., Mumbai and Ors.,

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

¶8

Shri B. M. Khan, Advocate for petitioner.

¶9

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND

¶10

ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶11

DATED : 14.09.2021

¶12

1.After hearing this matter for some time, learned
counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave of
the Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to make a
fresh and suitable representation with the respondents in
the light of the guidelines stated in the Administrative
Circular dated 03.03.2006.

¶13

2. Leave with liberty as prayed for is granted.

¶14

3. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn accordingly. No costs.

¶15

JUDGEJUDGE

¶16

Kirtak

Nitin Gangadhar Meshram v. Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Gangadhar Meshram v. Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Premlata Kawduji Burange and Another Vs Sub Divisional Officer, Hinganghat

Wardha Zilla Contractor Kalyan Samiti, Wardha through President Kishor Manikchandra Mitakri Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Department of Public Work, Mumbai and Others

Ushabai Manohar Koche Vs State of Maharashtra, Medical Education and Drugs Dept. Mumbai and Others

Karulal S/O Parasram Rahangdale Vs Shri Saraswati Vidya Mandir, Amgaon, Gondia, Thr. Its President and Others

Vinod S/O Deokumar Guldekar Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secy., Dept. of Agri. Animal Hus. Dairy Dev. and Fisheries, Mumbai and Ors.

Tulshiram Nathmal Toshniwal Vs General Manager, Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal and Others