High Court Criminal Writ Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition seeking discharge, dismissing the petition with liberty to approach the trial court.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach trial court for discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
9_wp.339.2019.doc
Digitally signed by Vishwanath Vishwanath S. Sherla S. Sherla Date: 2021.03.17 10:27:53 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.339 OF 2019
Mehul Mahendra Tundejwala & others … Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra & another … Respondents
Mr.R.J. Rathod for the Petitioners
Dr.F.R. Shaikh, APP, for Respondent – State
Mr.Rahul Dangle for Respondent No.2
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 16, 2021
P.C.:
1. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to approach the trial Court for discharge.
2. Leave granted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
(S.S. SHINDE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Mehul Mahendra Tundejwala & others
State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
