Allowed

Pundlik S/O Pandurang Kale v. the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Its Member Secretary

Bombay HC8 Sept 2021WP/3334/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged the inaction of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee regarding his tribal claim. The High Court allowed the petition, directing the Committee to decide the claim within one year.

What did the court decide?

The respondent Committee is directed to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner within one year from the date of the order.

Pundlik S/O Pandurang Kale Vs the Scheduled Tribe Caste… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

wp3334.2021.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3334/2021

¶5

Pundlik S/o Pandurang Kale,
aged about 55 Yrs., Occ. Sarpanch,
R/o Village Asegaon Pen, Tq. Risod,
Dist. Washim.

¶6

 ..Petitioner.

¶7

..Vs..

¶8

The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Amravati, through
its Member Secretary having its office
at Amravati, Tq. & Dist. Amravati.

¶9

..Respondent.

¶10

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Tejas Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms Nivedita P. Mehta, A.G.P. for the respondent.

¶11

CORAM:- SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED:- 8.9.2021.

¶12

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Sunil B. Shukre, J.)

¶13

Heard Mr. Tejas Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner

¶14

and Ms Nivedita P. Mehta, learned A.G.P. who appears by waiving

¶15

notice for the respondent. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.
Heard finally by consent.

¶16

2. A limited relief has been sought in this petition and in our

¶17

2 wp3334.2021.odt

¶18

opinion, it can be granted now.

¶19

3. The petition is allowed .

¶20

4 The respondent Committee is directed to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of one year from the date of the order. Rule accordingly. No costs.

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

 JUDGE

¶23

Tambaskar.

Pundlik S/O Pandurang Kale v. the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Its Member Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pundlik S/O Pandurang Kale v. the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Its Member Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramakant S/O Umashankar Khetan Thr. P.O.A. Syed Zakir Ali Syed Ibrahim Ali Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Revenue Dept., Mumbai and Others

Shri Surendra S/O Harishchandraji Patil and Others Vs State of Mah.,Thr.Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development and Water Conservation and 1

Sau. Swati Sunil Nimbolkar Vs Additional District and Session Judge, Mangrulpir and Another

Baba Taj Rozgar Va Swayam Rozgar Bandhkam Seva Sahakari Sanstha, Thr. Pre. Suni. R. Gujar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Mumbai and Another

Arvind Ankushji Binzade Vs Union of India through Principal Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi and Others

Berojgaranchi Kshitij Nagrik Seva Sahakari Sanstha, Amravati Thr. President, Dinesh Gahalod Vs Amravati Municipal Corporation, Amravati, Thr. Commissioner and Another