Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition stating all submissions would be made in appropriate proceedings. Court kept rights open and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-WP-3310-19.doc
rsk
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3310 OF 2019
Tusti Reality Private Limited...Petitioner
vs.
Union of India through the Secretary
and 2 Ors.
...Respondents
Ms. Neha Anchlia a/w. Mr. Naresh Jain i/b Agrud Partners for Petitioner.
None for Respondents.
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM AND
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 18 NOVEMBER 2021
P. C. :
After the petition was heard for some time, Mr. Jain sought
leave of the Court to withdraw the petition and stated that all submissions
will be made in the appropriate proceedings. Keeping open the rights and
contentions of the petitioner as available in law, petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAJESHWARISUBODH SUBODHKARVE KARVE Date: 2021.11.22 10:46:17 +0530
Tusti Reality Private Limited
Union of India
Secretary
K. R. SHRIRAM
AMIT B. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court