This order disposes of a writ petition as not pressed after the petitioner withdrew the matter via praecipe, with no representation on the petitioner's side when the matter was called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by PRIYA PRIYA RAJESH RAJESH SOPARKAR SOPARKAR Date: 2021.09.22 15:36:49 +0530
1 2 wp 3126--13-c--
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3126 OF 2013
M/s Jubilant Industries Limited … Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents
Mr.D.B.Savant, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.L.Babar, AGP for the Respondents/State.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2021.
P.C.:-
This matter is listed today on praecipe filed by Mr.D.B.Savant, learned counsel for the petitioner.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.)
M/s Jubilant Industries Limited
State of Maharashtra and ors.
UJJAL BHUYAN
MADHAV J. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
