Disposed

Smt. Gita Wd/O Chandrakant Hemke and 2 Others v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and 2 Others

Bombay HC9 Mar 2021WP/2999/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition regarding appointment on a compassionate basis. It directed the petitioner to submit a complete proposal within three weeks, after which the respondent must decide within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to submit proposal within three weeks; Respondent to decide within eight weeks.

Smt. Gita Wd/O Chandrakant Hemke and 2 Others Vs the… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

10.wp 2999.2018.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No. 2999 of 2018

¶5

Smt. Gita Wd/o Chandrakant Hemke and others …Petitioners

¶6

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and others

¶7

...Respondents

¶8

Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Petitioners. Shri D.P. Thakare, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State

¶9

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶10

DATED : 9 MARCH 2021

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶13

The reply-affidavit is filed by Prabhudas Punayya Sadamwar, working as Assistant Project Officer, Tribal Development, Gadchiroli, wherein he has stated in Paragraph No.8 as under:

¶14

“8. The answering respondent humbly submits that, the submissions made by the petitioners in respect of guidelines issued in Government Resolution dated 11.09.2019 is not disputed. However, the petitioner No.2 till this date failed to submit complete proposal in accordance with the Government guidelines issued in the Government Resolutions and Rules, therefore, if the petitioner No.2

¶15

nd.thawre

¶16

2 10.wp 2999.2018.odt

¶17

submit the complete proposal in terms of the Government Resolution dated 11.09.2019, the same can be decided by the answering respondent in terms of those guidelines.

¶18

In view of the above, if the complete proposal in terms of Government Resolution is forwarded to the answering respondent, same will be decided. Therefore, the instant petition may kindly be dismissed accordingly.”

¶19

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner will submit a proposal as above within a period of three weeks and the Respondents should consider the same as early as possible keeping in mind the subject matter of the dispute i.e. appointment on compassionate basis.

¶20

The learned AGP states that earlier proposal has not been rejected.

¶21

In view of the above consensus, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing that the Petitioner will submit a proposal within a period of three weeks and upon receipt of such proposal, the Respondents will decide the same within a period of eight weeks and inform the Petitioner of the outcome.

¶22

nd.thawre

Smt. Gita Wd/O Chandrakant Hemke and 2 Others v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Gita Wd/O Chandrakant Hemke and 2 Others v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Uma W/O R.D. Sharma Vs the Chairman, Nagpur Improvement Trust and Another

Rajesh S/O Prabhakarrao Jumle Vs Jt. Commissioner and Vice-Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and Others

Nitesh Shamrao Pawade and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Rural Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Gulab Namdeo Bhure Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-Operative Socieities, Nagpur and 2

Asha Haridas Katvala and Another Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Department of Home, Mumbai and Others

Vijaysingh Surendra Singh Gahilot and 2 Others. Vs the State of Mah and Others...