Disposed
Hakimuddin Raj Malegoanwala v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/2982/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
36.wp-2982-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2982 OF 2021
Hakimuddin Raj Malegaonwala Versus
…. Petitioner
The State of Maharashtra and another …. Respondents
Mr. Rupesh Zade, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. A.S. Pai, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 07 DECEMBER 2021
P.C.
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition as he states that the Petitioner intends to avail of the remedy of filing application for discharge.
PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE
Digitally signed by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2021.12.08 14:49:40 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
1 / 1
Hakimuddin Raj Malegaonwala
The State of Maharashtra and another
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court