Petitioners sought permission to withdraw Writ Petition No. 297 of 2017. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the Writ Petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-297-2017.DOC
Andreza
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 297 OF 2017
Amira Abdul Razaq & 2 Ors. … Petitioners Versus Shakuntala Ravindra Shetty & 2 Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Anand Shirodkar, Advocate holding for Mr. S. Karpe, Advocate for the Petitioners.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J DATED: 23rd December, 2021
P.C.
1. This Petition was mentioned in the morning at 10.30 a.m. for listing on the ground that the Petitioners had instructed the Counsel to withdraw the Writ Petition. Hence, the Petition was directed to be listed at the end of the admission board.
2. On the Petition being called out for hearing, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions of the Petitioners, who are present in Court, sought permission to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
3. Hence, Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
MANISH PITALE, J
Page 1 of 1
23rd December 2021
Amira Abdul Razaq & 2 Ors.
Shakuntala Ravindra Shetty & 2 Ors.
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
