Petitioners sought leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach an alternate remedy after the completion of elections. The High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
913-wp-293-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 WRIT PETITION NO.293 OF 2021
DYANDEO EKNATH SHIPALKAR AND OTHERS..PETITIONERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Rahul R. Karpe, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. A. B. Kadethankar, Advocate for Respondent
No.2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 12th JANUARY, 2021.
PER COURT:-
1.We have heard the learned counsel for the
State Election Commission.
2.Mr. Karpe, learned counsel for petitioners
on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the writ
petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy
after the elections are over.
3.Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
4.The petitioners may avail the alternate
remedy as may be permissible under law.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGEDevendra/January-2021
Dyandeo Eknath Shipalkar And Others
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court