The petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to agitate the issues if the necessity arises. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42-wp-283-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.283 OF 2021
63 Moons Technologies Limited ...Petitioner vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Offce ...Respondents
Mr. Rahul Sarda a/w. Mantul Bajpai, Mr. Vrushali Vig i/b.M/s. Crawford Bayley and Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Harsh Dedhia i/b. Mr. H.S. Venegaonkar, for Respdt. No. 1. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State.
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 24, 2021
P.C.:
of the averments in paragraph No. 7 of the affdavit in reply, the
petitioner’s grievance stands readdressed for the present.
withdraw the petition with liberty to agitate the issues again in case the necessity arises.
prayed for.
1/1
Vishal Parekar
63 Moons Technologies Limited
Serious Fraud Investigation Office
S. S. SHINDE
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
