In this writ petition, the petitioner sought direction to continue an election process. The court held that the petition's purpose was served as the election was scheduled on March 21, 2021. The petition was dismissed without costs, and no substantive relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 934-WP-2686-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2686 OF 2020
Bhagwan S/o Dnyanoba Sanap
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr N.R. Pawade, Advocate for Petitioner Mr D.R. Kale, I/c. Government Pleader for Respondent No. 1 Mr S.K. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 19th MARCH, 2021
PER COURT :
[ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. ] [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
mta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to continue the election process stands served and requires disposal.
Bhagwan S/o Dnyanoba Sanap
The State of Maharashtra
Ors.
S.V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
