High Court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner underwent medical termination of pregnancy as permitted earlier. Court recorded hospital confirmation and noted no further order was required.
None. Writ petition disposed of by recording that medical termination took place as previously permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2 wp 2565-21-c
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2565 OF 2021
Priyanka Vaibhav Patil … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Ms.Rachita Avinash Padwal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Mamta Shrivastava, AGP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : JULY 20, 2021.
P.C.:-
Heard Ms.Rachita Padwal, learned counsel for the petitioner; and Ms.Mamta Shrivastava, learned AGP for the respondent/State.
Priya Soparkar 2 2 wp 2565-21-c
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.)
Priyanka Vaibhav Patil
State of Maharashtra
Ujjal Bhuyan
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
