According to the petitioner, when he was in need of the said machineries, and the same were to be sent to Aurangabad, he requested the respondent No.2 and others to hand over the said machineries, as the same were required at the construction site of Samruddhi Mahamarg. The petitioner has alleged that the respondent No.2 and others refused to hand over the said machineries, pursuant to which, he approached the police and other authorities. It appears that in September 2020, FIR was registered with the Manmad City Police Station, as against the respondent No.2 and others. It also appears that subsequently with the interference of the Superintendent of Police, Nashik Rural, with whom a grievance was made by the petitioner, the petitioner's supplementary statement was recorded by the police. In the said supplementary statement recorded, the petitioner has alleged that the notarized document showing purchase of the machineries by the respondent No.2 from the petitioner was forged and fabricated. The said notarized document is on page 103 of the petition i.e. Exhibit - ‘C’. It is the petitioner's case that he has not signed the said notarized document. From the perusal of the said notarized document, it appears that the stamp paper was not purchased in the name of the petitioner but in the name of one, Nandsingh Narayan Singh. From the police report dated 11th October 2020 of PSI, Ganesh Jambhale, Manmad Police Station, it appears that the Notary in his statement has stated that the petitioner had not come to sign
