The single judge ordered respondent No.3 to decide the pending proposal for transfer of the petitioner from unaided to aided post within four months, adhering to the judgment in WP No. 1493 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
966-wp-2290-21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2290 OF 2021
Supriya Shridharrao Jagtap... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and others... Respondents.
Mr. Ganesh Gadhe, Advocate h/f Mr. R.I. Wakade, Advocate for the
Petitioner.
Ms. P.V.Diggikar, A.G.P. for all the Respondents.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 04th FEBRUARY, 2021
PER COURT :-
1. The proposal seeking approval to transfer of the petitioner from
unaided to aided post is pending with respondent No.3.
2. Learned A.G.P. accepts the notice for all the respondents.
3. In case, the proposal seeking approval to transfer of the
petitioner from unaided to aided post is pending with respondent
No.3, then respondent No.3 shall decide the same on its own merits
and in accordance with law, policy and in tune with the judgment
dated 04.07.2019 in Writ Petition No. 1493 of 2018. The same be
decided preferably within four months.
4. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI )( S.V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
S.P. Rane
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent No.3 shall decide the pending proposal for transfer of the petitioner from unaided to aided post on merits within four months?
Supriya Shridharrao Jagtap
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court