Petitioners sought directions to decide a pending application regarding village fund misappropriation. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with the petitioners intending to file a PIL.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2288.20wp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
27 WRIT PETITION NO.2288 OF 2020
RAMESH JANIKRAM BHARATE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr S. G. Jadhavar, Advocate for petitioners; Mr P. S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No.1; Mr V. R. Shinde, Advocate for respondent No.4; Mr S. B. Choudhari, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 & 9
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ. DATE : 20th September, 2021
PER COURT:
“23-B. By issuing writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the like nature, the respondent authority may kindly be direct to decide the application dated, 18-12-2019 filed by the petitioner in the light of Government Resolution dated, 04-01-2017.”
(2)
2288.20wp
panchayat for indulgence in misappropriation and siphoning off of the funds. When called upon as to what is the personal injury caused to the petitioners for which they seek our directions by exercising our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, the learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that they are tax payers.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
Ramesh Janikram Bharate and Another
The State of Maharashtra and Others
Ravindra V. Ghuge
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
