of the No Confdence Motion by referring the disputes, however, without adhering to those grounds and deciding anything on it, the learned Collector has simply given directions to hold special Gram Sabha meeting. In terms of provisions of subtsection (3tB) of Section of the Act, if the Sarpanch, or, as the case may be, Upat Sarpanch, desires to dispute the validity of the motion carried under subtsection (3), he shall, within seven days from the date on which such motion was carried, refer the dispute to the Collector who shall decide it as far as possible, within thirty days from the date on which it was received by him and his decision shall be fnal. The learned Collector, instead of deciding that dispute, directed to hold the special Gram Sabha meeting under the Chairmanship of Block Development Offcer, Panchayat Samiti, Tulzapur. Though during pendency of these writ petitions, the Gram Sabha was conducted under the Chairmanship of Block Development Offcer, Panchayat Samiti, Tulzapur and the said No Confdence Motion was ratifed by majority of villagers in the special Gram Sabha meeting, however, in the event if the Gram Sabha would have voted against the No Confdence Motion and if the Gram Sabha would not have ratifed the said No Confdence Motion, then the situation would have been very confusing, since the learned Collector has not decided the said disputes fnally.
