The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by leave to withdraw due to the petitioner's inability to deposit the required security amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
911.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 WRIT PETITION NO.2140 OF 2021
SHAIKH SHABBIR SHAIKH ABDUL RAHMAN KURESHI AND ANOTHER VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri M. K. Bhosle AGP for Respondents – State : Shri P. S. Patil
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 18th FEBRUARY, 2021
PER COURT :
2. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.)
(S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
shp/-
Shaikh Shabbir Shaikh Abdul Rahman Kureshi
State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
