Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition as the underlying application was dismissed by the trial court. Court allowed withdrawal and disposed of the interim application, noting no merits hearing.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; interim application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-WP-2003-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2003 OF 2021
Sheetal Tejwani ...Petitioner Versus Criminal Investigation Department & Anr. ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1453 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2003 OF 2021 Vinay Vivek Arahna ...Intervener/Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Sheetal Tejwani ...Petitioner Versus Criminal Investigation Department & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Sagar Kursija i/b Ms. Rupali Kedar for the Petitioner
Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar, A.P.P for the Respondent No.2–State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. (THROUGH VIDEO-CONFERENCING) TUESDAY, 6th JULY 2021
P.C. :
1 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid writ
petition will not survive and is rendered infructuous inasmuch as the main
1/2
6-WP-2003-2021.doc
application filed by the respondent No. 1 has been dismissed by the trial Court vide order dated 20th June 2021. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the said application.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
Sheetal Tejwani
Criminal Investigation Department & Anr.
Vinay Vivek Arahna
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
