The High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, directed the Committee to decide the petitioner's pending tribe validity claim on or before 31.03.2022 and kept the departmental enquiry in abeyance pending that decision.
Direction to decide tribe validity claim by 31 March 2022; departmental enquiry kept in abeyance pending said decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1956.20wp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 WRIT PETITION NO.1956 OF 2020
HEMANT CHANDAN THAKUR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr M. A. Golegaonkar, Advocate for petitioner; Mr S. G. Sangle, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2; Mr A. S. Shelke, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 & 4
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 27th August, 2021
PER COURT:
1956.20wp (2)
in submitting his tribe validity certificate, which he had undertaken to file while joining duties. As such, the said enquiry shall be kept in abeyance till the tribe validity claim is decided on or before 31/03/2022. If the claim is accepted, the enquiry shall be dropped.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to frame a time-bound direction for the Committee to decide the pending tribe validity claim of the petitioner.
Whether to pause the departmental enquiry initiated against the petitioner for failing to produce the tribe validity certificate.
Hemant Chandan Thakur
The State of Maharashtra
Committee
Respondent Nos. 3 and 4
S. G. Mehare
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
