The single-judge Bench disposed of the writ petition and accompanying civil application as withdrawn. The Court observed that the underlying suit must now be decided expeditiously.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; civil application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-WP1887-2017 WITH CAW347-2017.DOC
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1887 OF 2017
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 347 OF 2017
Jalindar Sakharam Baravkar
...Petitioner/Applicant
Versus
Lahanu Rama Baravkar & Ors...Respondents
Ms. Aditi S. Naikare, for the Petitioner/Applicant.
CORAM:Smt. Bharati Dangre, J.
DATED:13th December 2021
P.C. :-
1. The Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions in writing received from the Petitioner, seek withdrawal of the writ petition. The written instructions are taken on record.
2. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. In view of this, the civil application is also disposed of as infructuous.
Page 1 of 2
4-WP1887-2017 WITH CAW347-2017.DOC
3.Needless to state that since the writ petition is
withdrawn, the original Suit shall be decided expeditiously.
(Smt. Bharati Dangre, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Jalindar Sakharam Baravkar
Lahanu Rama Baravkar & Ors
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court