The Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 1713 of 2019 on consent terms entered into by the parties after admitting additional respondents, with the new parties impleaded notwithstanding no cost being awarded.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of consent terms; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-WP.1713.2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1713 OF 2019
Ranganath Seena Poojari and Anr. } Petitioners Versus Sub-Divisional Officer or Magistrate } and the Maintenance Tribunal and Ors. } Respondents
Ms. Tanmayi Rajadhyaksha (Gadre) with Mr. Sunil Badsiwal i/b. Legal Pyramids for the petitioners.
Mr. Kamal Katha i/b Mr. Yatin R. Shah for respondent nos. 3 to 5.
Ms. R. A. Salunkhe-AGP for State.
Mr. Ranganath Seena Poojari-petitioner no. 1 present.
Ms. Roopa Ranganath Poojari petitioner no. 2 present.
CORAM :- G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- SEPTEMBER 30, 2021
PC :-
1. Leave to amend to implead Mr. Karunakar Seena Poojari and Mrs. Indira J. Poojari as party respondent. Amendment be carried out forthwith.
2. Ms. Rajadhyaksha, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Katha, learned advocate for the respondent no. 3 have jointly tendered consent terms entered into between the petitioners and the respondent no. 3 and the newly added respondents. They pray that the petition be disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
Page 1 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PS
10-WP.1713.2019
3. The consent terms are signed by the parties, who are present in court and are identified by their respective advocates. The respondent no. 3 has put her left-hand thumb impression and which is also identified by the advocate for the respondent no. 3. There is no dispute on the signatures put on the consent terms. It is stated that Mr. Yatin R. Shah, advocate for respondent no. 3 has explained all the terms of the consent terms to his client respondent no. 3 and she was aggregable to all the conditions before she has put up her left-hand thumb impression.
4. The consent terms are accordingly taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No costs.
5. The Court records its appreciation to the efforts taken by the learned counsel for the parties and their advocates in the efforts taken by them to guide the parties to reach a settlement.
SALUNKE J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2021.10.04 18:06:22 +0530
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PS
Ranganath Seena Poojari and Another
Sub-Divisional Officer or Magistrate
Maintenance Tribunal
Karunakar Seena Poojari
Indira J. Poojari
G. S. Kulkarni
J. V. Salunke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
