Disposed

Chhaya Abhishek Wankhade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O., Mahuli Jahagir, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati and Another

Bombay HC20 Aug 2021WP/163/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition. The court observed that the investigating officer had filed an A-Summary before the Magistrate. The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the learned Magistrate regarding the A-Summary.

What did the court decide?

Disposed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the learned Magistrate regarding the A-Summary.

Chhaya Abhishek Wankhade Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

crwp163.21.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 163/2021

¶5

Chhaya Abhishek Wankhade .vs. State of Maharashtra through PSO Mahuli
Jahagir, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati.

¶6

 _______________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directionsCourt's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.

¶7

Mr. S. M. Vaishnav, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. V. A. Thakare, A.P.P. for respondents-State.

¶8

CORAM :V.M. DESHPANDE AND AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 20, 2021

¶9

This writ petition is filed on behalf of original
complainant claiming for various reliefs.

¶10

Notices were issued in this writ petition. In
pursuance of the notice, respondent no.1 has filed
detailed submissions.

¶11

Today, Mr. Vaishnav, learned counsel for
petitioner, invited our attention to paragraph 10 of the
reply filed by the investigating officer to show that the
investigating officer has already filed “A-Summary” before
the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amravati.

¶12

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, if he chooses to
file an appropriate application before the learned
Magistrate in respect of the A-Summary.

¶13

JUDGE

¶14

JUDGE

¶15

kahale

Chhaya Abhishek Wankhade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O., Mahuli Jahagir, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhaya Abhishek Wankhade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O., Mahuli Jahagir, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mubeen Ahmed Gaffar Khan and Another Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Frezerpura and Another

Gopal S/O. Janrao Sarap (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Patur Dist. Akola

Dalaram Kodaram Chimpa and 8 Others (in Jail) Vs State of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps Gittikhadan, Nagpur City, Distnagpur

Mahek D/O Shyam Sharma Thr. Her Custodian- Parmanand S/O Matasharan Dubey Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Station, City Kotwali, Akola and Another

Rohit S/O Prem Baghel Vs Deputy Inspector General of Prison (East), Nagpur and Another

Milind S/O Hiralal Matale and Another Vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Washim (City) Tq and Distwashim and Another