Disposed

Bhiva Gahnaji Narwade and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC20 Oct 2021WP/11654/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The respondent authority was directed to decide pending applications filed under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act expeditiously, preferably within nine months, after hearing all parties. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No. 2 to decide pending applications under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act within nine months after hearing parties.

Bhiva Gahnaji Narwade and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 9-wp 10502-2021+.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 10502 OF 2021

¶4

Omkar Shankar Jogdande
and others.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.. Respondents

¶5

Mr. Avinash R. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶6

AND
 WRIT PETITION NO. 11512 OF 2021

¶7

Ashok Umaji Avhale
and others.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.. Respondents

¶8

Mr. Avinash R. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶9

AND

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 11654 OF 2021

¶11

Bhiva Gahnaji Narwade
and others.. Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State of Maharashtra and others.. Respondents

¶14

Mr. Avinash R. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶15

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

¶16

 DATED : 20th October, 2021.

¶17

1 of 2

¶18

2 9-wp 10502-2021+.odt

¶19

PER COURT:-

¶20

.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have filed applications under Section 28-A of the Land
Acquisition Act before the respondent No. 2 in the year 2014. The same
are not yet decided.

¶21

2. The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶22

3.In case, the applications filed by the petitioners under Section
28-A of the Land Acquisition Act (page no. 23) are pending with the
respondent No. 2, then the respondent No. 2 shall decide the same on
its own merits, in accordance with law and policy, after hearing all
parties concerned, expeditiously and preferably within a period of nine
(09) months from today.

¶23

4. It shall also verify whether the appeal is pending. If the appeal is pending, certainly the Special Land Acquisition Officer would have to stay its hands off.

¶24

5. Writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶25

( R. N. LADDHA )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶26

P.S.B.

¶27

2 of 2

Bhiva Gahnaji Narwade and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhiva Gahnaji Narwade and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Shivaji Mate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Subhash Bhagwan Suradkar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Bhalchandra Lala Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rakesh Shankarrao Biradar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rajendra Murlidhar Chavan Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ashok Umaji Avhale and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others