On the petition seeking a direction for passport issuance, the court accepted the respondents' statement that compliance with formalities would trigger the process and merely directed expediting consideration without issuing specific directives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-wp-1161-21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1161 OF 2021
Razia Mohammed Altaf Siwani Versus
The Union of India & Ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr. Ayaz Khan i/b. Ajay Bhise for Petitioner. Mr. D. P. Singh for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for State/Respondent No.4.
__________ CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 15 DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :
. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. This Petition is filed for a direction to the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to issue full validity passport to the Petitioner.
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2021.12.18 14:26:30 +0530
1 of 2
Gokhale
2904-wp-1161-21
the Ministry and thereupon after receipt of communication, necessary decision can be taken, however, there is no response from the Petitioner, even after a reminder. The learned counsel for the Petitioner disputes this position.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued for the issuance of a new passport to the petitioner given pending instructions from authorities.
Razia Mohammed Altaf Siwani
The Union of India
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court