Disposed
Oberoi Realty Limited and Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1150/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.WPNo.11502021.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1150 OF 2021
Oberoi Realty Limited & Anr. ... Petitioners versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1353 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1150 OF 2021
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
… Applicants
In the Matter Between : Oberoi Realty Limited & Anr. ... Petitioners versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents
Ms.Garima Agrawal i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co., Advocate for the Petitioner in WP/1150/2021/Respondent in IA/1353/2021.
Ms.Oorja Dhond, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 in WP/1150/2201/Applicant in IA/1353/2021.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- JULY 1, 2021
PC :
1 By our order dated 8th June 2021, we had disposed of the
above writ petition observing that the petitioner may make a
1/2
Gaikwad RD
4.WPNo.11502021.docx
fresh representation asserting its claim for payment of development charges on the basis of ‘predominant residential user’ on the proposed commercial development, to be made within three days from the date of the Order. If such representation was to be made, the Municipal Corporation was directed to grant an opportunity of a hearing to the petitioner and pass a reasoned order within two weeks from the receipt of representation
2 By this application, applicant/Corporation prays for an extension of time by three weeks to pass a reasoned order. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not have any objection if an extension is granted to the municipal corporation.
3 We consider it appropriate to allow the municipal corporation’s application in terms of prayer clause (a).
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court