The court disposed of the writ petition challenging the petitioner's demotion and transfer. It held that alternate remedies exist under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads (Discipline and Appeal) Rules and Government Resolutions, granting liberty to approach those forums.
Petition dismissed with liberty to avails alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 10531.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10531 OF 2021
Makrand Renukadas Sonnekar .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Joslyn Anthony Menezes, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2021.
FINAL ORDER :
. We have heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No. 1.
2 wp 10531.21
liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy. In that event all contentions are kept open. No costs.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
bsb/Sept.21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging demotion and transfer is maintainable given the availability of alternate remedies.
Makrand Renukadas Sonnekar
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
