Held a writ petition infructuous as some accused persons were subsequently elected to the managing committee and the committee's term had expired.
Infructuous order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP No.1037/19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.1037/2019
MAZANIA OF SHREE KRISHNA
RAVALNATH DEVASTHAN, THR.
ITS PRESIDENT, PREMANAND
P. PHADTE (NAGESHKAR) … Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF GOA, THR.
ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
AND 6 ORS.
... Respondents
Mr. S. D. Padiyar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Coram:-M.S. SONAK, J.
Date:-15th June 2021
P. C.:
Heard Mr. S. D. Padiyar for the Petitioner.
2.The basic grievance in this matter was that the persons referred
to in paragraph 7 of the petition were unauthorisedly interfering with
the managing committee discharging its functions.
3.Today, the position is that some of the persons referred to in
paragraph 7 of the petition, including, the persons at (d) and (f) have
been elected to the managing committee. As such, to a great extent,
the reliefs in this petition have been rendered infructuous. Even the
2
WP No.1037/19
term of the managing committee, which had instituted the present
petition, appears to have expired.
4. For all the aforesaid reasons, this petition is disposed of as infructuous.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
M. S. SONAK, J.
ss*
MAZANIA OF SHREE KRISHNA RAVALNATH DEVASTHAN, THR. ITS PRESIDENT, PREMANAND P. PHADTE (NAGESHKAR)
THE STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 6 ORS.
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court