Partly allowed

Mayuri D/O Vijayrao Bhamkar v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC22 Feb 2021WP/1009/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged delay in processing her caste claim. Court directed Respondent Scrutiny Committee to decide pending claim within six months but refused to update application for reserved category exam eligibility due to incomplete annexures.

What did the court decide?

Respondent Scrutiny Committee directed to decide pending caste claim within 6 months; prayer to continue petitioner in reserved category refused.

Mayuri D/O Vijayrao Bhamkar Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

Order

2202wp1009.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 1009/2021.

¶6

Mayuri Vijayrao Bhamkar. …. Petitioner.

¶7

- VERSUS-

¶8

1.The State of Maharashtra

¶9

and others.

¶10

…. Respondents.

¶11

Shri L.Y. Nandeshwar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶12

Shri A.A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶13

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 22 FEBRUARY 2021.

¶14

P.C.

¶15

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶16

By this petition the Petitioner is seeking a direction to the Respondent Scrutiny Committee to dispose of the pending caste claim of the Petitioner.

¶17

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the caste

Order

2202wp1009.21

claim of the Petitioner was referred to the Scrutiny Committee on 22 July 2019 and is pending.

¶22

The learned Assistant Government Pleader has placed before us a chart containing consolidated statement of the pending cases before the Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur which shows that even for education purpose 644 claims are pending starting from the year 2009.

¶23

That being the position, we dispose of the Writ Petition directing the Respondent Scrutiny Committee to take a decision on the pending caste claim of the Petitioner within a period of 6 months from the date this order reaches it, subject to earlier time bound directions.

¶24

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶25

Considering the fact that the Petitioner is not yet been granted the validity certificate and that nothing except the application and the mark sheet is annexed to the petition, the prayer of the Petitioner to accept examination form, meaning thereby continuing the Petitioner to appear in the reserved category, cannot be granted. The same stands refused.

¶26

(ANIL S. KILOR, J) (NITIN JAMDAR, J) Rgd

¶27

Digitally signed Rakesh by Rakesh Dhuriya Date: 2021.02.24 Dhuriya 14:29:30 +0530

Mayuri D/O Vijayrao Bhamkar v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayuri D/O Vijayrao Bhamkar v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Girja W/O Sajjan Dhurve and Another Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Secretary for Rural Development and Water Conservation Dep. Mumbai and Othe

Sarlabai Narayandasji Sikchi Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Urban Developent Department, Mumbai and Others

Sukhadev S/O. Rajaram Shejul Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Chief Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Others

Rakesh S/O Bhaiyyaji Khunkar Vs Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. Nagpur Thr. Managing Director and Another

Union of India Thru. Secty. and 4 Ors. Vs Dr. Suresh Kumar Chellani (Dead) Thr Lrs Barkha Chellani and Another

Satish S/O Dhanbahadur Thakur and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Mumbai and Others