Allowed

Ramnath Chandro Gawas and 7 Ors., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.

Bombay HC15 Jul 2021WP/100/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought to withdraw Writ Petition No. 100 of 2020 with liberty to raise grievances elsewhere. The Court allowed withdrawal subject to payment of adjudicator fees by both sides. Consequently, the linked Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 132 of 2021 seeking intervention was also disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition withdrawn with liberty to raise grievances; rights and contentions of respondents kept open; interlocutory application disposed of.

Ramnath Chandro Gawas and 7 Ors., Vs State of Goa… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

20 MCA 132 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2020

¶5

RAMNATH CHANDRO GAWAS AND 7
ORS.….PETITIONERS

¶6

VS

¶7

STATE OF GOA, THR. ITS CHIEF
SECRETARY AND 3 ORS. ….RESPONDENTS

¶8

WITH

¶9

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2021
IN

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2020

¶11

DURGESH CHANDRAKANT MAJIK AND
4 ORS….APPLICANTS

¶12

VS

¶13

RAMNATH CHANDRO GAWAS AND 7
ORS….RESPONDENTS

¶14

***

¶15

Mr. Preetam Talaulikar, Advocate for the Petitioners.

¶16

Mr. Devidas J. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. Deep Shirodkar,
Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
Mr. S. Sardessai, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.

¶17

Mr. Jayant P. Mulgaonkar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rupa Banaulikar,
Advocate for the Intervenor.

¶18

Coram: M.S. Sonak &
M.S. Jawalkar, JJ.
 Date:15th July 2021.

¶19

P.C. :

¶20

Mr. Preetam Talaulikar, the learned Counsel for the
petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Petition with
liberty to raise the grievances before the appropriate forum.

¶21

¶22

20 MCA 132 of 2021

¶23

2.The learned Counsel for the respondents have no objection
to petitioners' adoption of the aforesaid course. However, they submit
that all rights and contentions of the respondents should also be kept
open.

¶24

3.Mr. Talaulikar states that Mr. R.G. Ramani, learned Senior
Advocate of the Court was appointed as Adjudicator in the matter. He
states that the petitioners will pay the fees of the Adjudicator within a
period of four weeks from today. Mr. Sardessai, the learned Counsel for
respondent no. 4 also states that such fees will indeed be paid to the
Adjudicator within four weeks from today.

¶25

4. The aforesaid statement is accepted.

¶26

5.Accordingly, by keeping open all rights and contentions of
all parties, this Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed
for.

¶27

6.Since, the Petition itself is withdrawn, Miscellaneous Civil
Application No. 132/2021 seeking intervention will not survive and the
same is also disposed of.

¶28

 M. S. JAWALKAR, J. M. S. SONAK, J.

¶29

EV

¶30

VAIGANKAR Digitally signed by VAIGANKAR ESHA SAINATH ESHA SAINATH Date: 2021.07.16 11:43:36 +05'30'

Ramnath Chandro Gawas and 7 Ors., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramnath Chandro Gawas and 7 Ors., v. State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayanand Kankonkar and Anr., Vs State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.

Communidade of Sangolda, Rep. Thr. Their Attorney Vs the State of Goa, Thr. Their Chief Secretary and 10 Ors.

Naveen @ Pandurang K. Prabhu Vs Sanjay B. Naik and 3 Ors.

Jeronimo Oliveira De Souza Vs the State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.

John Constance Dsouza Vs State of Goa, Thr. Public Prosecutor and 2 Ors.

Durgesh Chandrakant Majik and 4 Ors. Vs Ramnath Chandro Gawas and 7 Ors.