Jyoti Karan Bajaj v. Krishanlal Ramkrishnan Mookhey (Deceased)
Case brief
What is this about?
: Shri. P. A . Jagdale, Officer on
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SLG
Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date : 24th July, 2023
CALLED FOR DIRECTION :
22 TP/344/2021 ) Mr. B. G. Saraf, Advocate for petitioner ) ) P.C.: 1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for ) petitioner. Ld. Advocate for petitioner has tendered ) draft of Judges Order alongwith Affidavit of ) petitioner duly affirmed on 05.07.2023, copy of grant ) issued on 27.09.2021, copy of Memorandum of ) Understanding executed on 08.04.2023 alongwith the ) ) revised copy of Memorandum of Understanding ) executed on 26.06.2023 and Consent Affidavit of ) Shivam Mookhey. ) ) 2. Upon perusal of draft of Judges Order, it ) appears that there are corrections in the said draft. ) Further more, petitioner to file documents showing ) ) of property has transferred in his name with this ) corrections. Hence, Ld. Advocate for petitioner to ) file corrected copy of draft. ) ) 3. Office to register the Judges Order, if draft of ) Judges Order found to be complied in all respect ) ) including pagination and marking exhibits and ) having been initialled by the undersigned officer. ) Remove from board.
24.07.2023
Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SLG
Coram
P. A. Jagdale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court