The High Court at Goa granted leave to the appellant to withdraw a second appeal filed in Second Appeal No. 63 of 2010 and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the appeal; the appeal disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2010
SHRI BABURAO TUKARAM
MANGALE.
Versus
MRS. RATNADEEP
BUILDERS REPRESENTED
BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR,
…..Appellant.
MR. MADHAV N. NAIK KUNDAIKAR ….. Respondents.
Mr. Valmiki Menezes, Advocate for the Appellant.
P.C.:-
On the mentioning of Mr. Menezes, the learned Counsel
for the Appellant in this Appeal, this matter is taken up on board,
today.
3.The order made on 18th March, 2021 is recalled and the
request of Mr. Menezes, on instructions, seeking leave to withdraw
this Appeal is accepted.
4.Accordingly, the leave is granted to withdraw this Appeal
and this Appeal is disposed of accordingly.
M.S. Sonak, J.
SANTOSH S MHAMAL Digitally signed by SANTOSH S MHAMAL Date: 2021.03.19 14:51:51 +05'30'
Shri Baburao Tukaram Mangale
Mrs. Ratnadeep Builders Represented by Its Sole Proprietor Mr. Madhav N. Naik Kundaikar
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court