The High Court dismissed the second appeal in default due to the appellant's repeated absence without valid reason and despite prior notices and cost impositions.
The Second Appeal is dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
921 SECOND APPEAL NO.347 OF 2021
BHUJANGA BAPUJI HAMBARDE
VERSUS
NAGORAO DATTARAM TARKE
Mr. R.D. Biradar, Advocate for the appellant - absent
Mr. R.I. Wakade, Advocate for the sole respondent
CORAM :SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
DATE:25th NOVEMBER, 2021
PER COURT:
1Learned Advocate for the appellant is absent. In the past also he
remained absent and inspite of giving directions to remove office objections
he took his own time to remove the same. Costs was also imposed on him,
which he has deposed. Thereafter, on 22.09.2021 he sought accommodation.
Now, he is absent without giving any reason. Under such circumstance, the
Second Appeal stands dismissed in default.
( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. )
agd
Bhujanga Bapuji Hambarde
Nagorao Dattaram Tarke
Vibha Kankanwadi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court