The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of two appeals and a civil application as withdrawn after the parties reached a settlement out of court.
Both appeals and the civil application were disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-sa-285-1991.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 SECOND APPEAL NO.285 OF 1991
GANGADHAR VISHWANATH SABALE.
VERSUS
NATHU PANDU KAMANDAR and OTHERS.
Advocate for Appellant Nos.1/A to 1/4 : Mr. Mantri Ramesh R. & Mr. R.
R. Sancheti, Mr. V. S. Bedre, Mr. N. N. Bhagwat
Advocate for Respondent Nos.1A to 1G : Mr. C. K. Shinde
Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 7 : Mr. B. R. Nawale
WITH CA/6829/2015 IN SA/286/1991
WITH SA/286/1991
CORAM:SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
DATE: 22.10.2021
ORDER:-
.Learned Advocate for the appellant submits that he has written
instructions to withdraw the appeals as the parties have arrived at
settlement out of the Court. The written communication, that has been
tendered, is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-‘X.
2. In view of the same, both the appeals as well as civil application
stand disposed of as withdrawn.
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.]
scm
(1)
GANGADHAR VISHWANATH SABALE
NATHU PANDU KAMANDAR and OTHERS
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court