Thereafter the permission was taken to lead secondary evidence and after DW 3 Baburao Ubale was examined, they were exhibited as Exhs.68 and 69. At that time, the true copy of the carbon copy was produced and then the secondary evidence has been led. However, now, by Civil Application No.11602 of 2014 original General Power of Attorney has been produced and permission has been sought under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The explanation, the appellants want to give for belated submission of the original, is that in the third week of November, 2014 when the applicants had taken cleanliness drive of their house, then they found some papers and in that they found the original General Power of Attorney dated 16.03.1971. It is to be noted that this application has been given by the legal representatives of the defendant No.1 who were unaware about the pendency of the Second Appeal filed by their father. Therefore, there was no occasion for them to produce those documents at any earlier stage. Under the said circumstance, now when the original Power of Attorney has been produced, it can be taken that under those documents Rupanbai had authority to sell the portion of the house, which had gone to the share of Madanlal and Babulal. Again at the costs of repetition, it has been submitted on behalf of the appellants that as plaintiff No.2 Babulal had not at all entered the witness box but now the original General Power of Attorney is coming on record, adverse inference is required to be drawn against him.
