The applicant approached this Court for relief. It appears the parties have settled amicably out of court, with the respondent allowed to withdraw the deposited amount. The current application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Application disposed of as withdrawn upon amicable settlement between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra202.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 202 OF 2019
Prashant s/o Kondo Kulkarni
Applicant
Versus
Smita Prashant Kulkarni Respondent
Mr. A.S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.B. Jadhav, APP for respondent.
CORAM : M.G. SEWLIKAR, J. DATE : 13th December, 2021.
PER COURT :
dyb
Prashant s/o Kondo Kulkarni
Smita Prashant Kulkarni
M.G. SEWLIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
