Applications filed under criminal revision jurisdiction were dismissed in default as the applicants failed to appear before the High Court despite a second call, resulting in no substantive decision being recorded.
Revision applications dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
sr.18
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 107 OF 2020 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2020 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 109 OF 2020
B.K. GUPTA AND ANR. ) APPLICANTS
V/S.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. ) RESPONDENTS
None for the applicant.
Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for State.
CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.
Tuesday, 7th December, 2021.
P.C. :
1. None appears for the applicants even on the
second call. Revision Applications are dismissed in default
for non-prosecution.
Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2021.12.07 17:02:39 +0530
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
B.K. Gupta and Anr.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Sandeep K. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
