The court disposed of this PIL as infructuous because the exemption challenged in the notice was for a particular year and no longer survival at the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-PIL-75-2019
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISIDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 75 OF 2019
Tribal Doctors Forum & Ors. .. Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for petitioners. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan for respondent no.1. Mr. P. P. Kakade, Govt. Pleader with Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for State.
C0RAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 4, 2021
PC :
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2021.10.05 10:18:14 +0530
1
Tribal Doctors Forum & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
