The application for release of amount was disposed of as withdrawn because the applicant on whose behalf the application was filed had expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-MCA-217-2021-FA-93-2018.DOC
Andreza
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 217 OF 2021 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 93 OF 2018
Rina Dinesh Kumar Gond Thr. POA Kapil … Petitioner Gaud
Versus IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Company …Respondents Ltd.,
Mr. Shailesh Redkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P. Shirodkar, Advocate holding for Mr. Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J DATED: 1st December, 2021
P.C.
1. On the matter being called out, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant informs this Court that the Applicant on whose behalf this application for release of amount was filed, has expired.
2. In this backdrop, it is submitted that the application may have to be withdrawn.
3. Hence, this application is disposed of as withdrawn.
MANISH PITALE, J
ANDREZA PEREIRA Digitally signed by ANDREZA PEREIRA Date: 2021.12.01 16:46:41 +05'30'
Page 1 of 1
1st December 2021
Rina Dinesh Kumar Gond (Thr. POA Kapil Gaud)
IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Company Ltd.
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
