Applications for fixing the date of hearing for two writ petitions were allowed due to interim relief restrictions. The petitions were listed for final disposal on 16/11/2021.
Applications allowed; Writ Petitions listed for final disposal/hearing on 16/11/2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(5) MCA 166, 167 21
Aura
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
Misc. Civil Application No. 166 of 2021
In W. P. No. 422 of 2018 and
Misc. Civil Application No. 167 of 2021 In Writ Petition No. 630 of 2018
Misc. Civil Application No. 166 of 2021 In W. P. No. 422 of 2018
DUMEN SILVEIRA
APPLICANT
Versus
TULSIDAS BHIKU NAIK AND 2 ORS.
RESPONDENTS
With
Misc. Civil Application No. 167 of 2021 In
Writ Petition No. 630 of 2018
DUMEN SILVEIRA APPLICANT
Versus CAITANO SILVEIRA RESPONDENT
Mr. Bandankar, Advocate for the Applicant Ms. R. Pereira, Advocate , f or the Respondent.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J DATED: 4thOctober, 2021
Oral Order :
Page 1 of 2 4th Oct..2021
(5) MCA 166, 167 21
1. These applications are being moved on behalf of the applicants with a prayer for fixing a date of hearing for these Writ Petitions in view of the urgency in the matter. It is stated that due to interim relief granted by this Court, the applicant is facing hardship for the reason that the applicant is unable to use the access road to the property in question.
2. It is further stated that the applicant is suffering from some health ailment.
3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed and it is directed that these Writ Petitions be listed for final disposal/hearing on 16/11/2021 at the end of the admission Board.
MANISH PITALE, J.
Page 2 of 2 4th Oct..2021
Dumen Silveira
Tulsidas Bhiku Naik and 2 Ors.
Caitano Silveira
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
